Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

The responses play right into the intent of Rahm E’s comments on Deface the Nation. All the of the liberal commentary has been Rush vs. Mitt, Rush vs. Newt, and now this. What they don’t report was actually what Rush said: It’s actually Rush vs. Brooks, Rush vs. Frum and Rush vs. to a less extent perhaps Noonan. But the liberal media doesn’t want to highlight that because they are the ‘Republican consultants’ along with David Rodham Gergen and Kevin Philips that have pushed the RINOs in our party on their programs. Steele isn’t a RINO.

The problem is that Steele and others aren’t as quick on their feet as Rush is. In the response to ‘isn’t Rush the ‘head of the Republican party’ he should have said, and he knows this, that Rush has never claimed to be, but he is a strong player in the conservative movement, etc. etc.


53 posted on 03/02/2009 10:14:43 AM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kent C
...that Rush has never claimed to be, but he is a strong player in the conservative movement, etc. etc.

Good come back.

55 posted on 03/02/2009 10:15:47 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Kent C
"...he should have said..."

But he didn't did he. He proved the voters in his state right....

66 posted on 03/02/2009 10:22:11 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson