It never fails to amaze me how some people are embarrassed for simply asking the birth location question.
The real BC has not been produced. He is hiding it, or it doesn't exist.
If he WAS born in Hawaii, he would produce it and put the subject to rest.
If he wasn't, but the rules made him eligible for POTUS anyway, he would also produce the evidence and the legal argument.
The fact that neither of these has happened implies he was not born in Hawaii and that it does matter.
WHY are questions of eligibility and applying the rules of law a sensitive matter to some conservatives? It seems reasonable to me. I do realize some (on both sides) seem immature in their public presentation, but that is on both sides and should not color either side of the argument.
Keep asking questions if you like...it’s still a free country. Personally I think this debate is a loser anyway but to label people who are asking about it is not only an antithesis to free thought it’s also a subtle form of intimidation which begs the question, while is all this necessary? It’s getting ridiculous when the commie moles come out pointing a finger at the people asking questions.