“II. Discussion
Rule 26(c)(1) authorizes the Court to enter a protective order to protect a party
from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including an order forbidding the discovery or specifying terms for discovery.”
the above taken from Obama’s motion.
-— “oppression” is not the reason, we are talking about the POTUS.
-—”undue burden or expense” is not the reason, he has spent more to defend himself than it would cost to produce the documents in question.