Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Martel
The one that I've seen had neither the clerk's "signature" rubber stamp marking nor evidence of a raised crimp seal.

You can't really make out any of those on the image that's on Fight the Smears because the sized it down considerably. However you can see evidence of both the embossed seal, the date stamp and the signature stamp in the high resolution versions which were posted on Daily Kos and Fact Check.

The high resolution version of the scanned image can be seen here.

If you zoom in to the full image in your browser, you can see the horizontal marks of the embossed seal just above the date stamp. Also, portions of the signature stamp can be seen bleeding through just above the words "prima facie" as well as some above the words "fact of" in the text near the bottom of the document.

And of course there are the photographs which were taken of the document at Obama's Chicago campaign headquarters which can be seen here.

There's nothing inconsistent between what's shown in the scanned image and the photographic images.


342 posted on 03/01/2009 11:20:05 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]


To: Michael Michael

I see you’re still shilling for Obama. You cannot discern enough detail from that scanned bogus seal from that bogus document with the naked eye to tell much of anything.


346 posted on 03/01/2009 11:37:47 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson