You were saying to “Canedawg” — “Thanks for stepping up to the plate. Yep..Star-Traveller is an agitator on BC threads....so you probably were confusing him/her with Starwise.”
Well, as it turns out, on this thread alone, there are all these “stars”.... STARWISE, EveningStar, LoneStarC; Star Traveler...
So, to clarify the position here, and — *especially* — in reference to this comment, Post #106 — “Wait just a minute here..ok? Starwise has been one of those questioning Obama’s BC from the beginning!”
Let me say (and I have said it before), that I had been questioning Obama’s qualifications, too (per the Constitution) and asking for the documentation, since prior to the election (easily checked out by seeing my posts prior to the election). The problem there, is that, apparently, about 69,456,897 Obama voters didn’t care and outvoted me (and others; almost 10 million more than for McCain).
And then, after that, I saw that some of those who had been complaining about the documentation, along with me, were now (after the election) saying that Obama would be stopped, because of this issue (i.e., “no documentation”). However, when I watched and waited — *nothing happened*.
I waited while I was told (by some here) that a court would invalidate this state or that state’s ballot or Electoral College vote. Then I was told that the Electoral College, itself, would not vote for Obama (or some would not, anyway). Next I was told a court would invalidate the election. And then I was told that a court would require Obama to produce the documentation. After that, I was told that even though some court cases failed to work, there were enough coming up that one of them would work. Then I was told that there would be an injunction preventing the Electoral College vote from counting. Another was that I was told that a court would give an injunction to prevent Obama from taking office. Then I heard that the Congress would question the lack of documentation when certifying the Electoral College vote (at least someone would, and that would be “it”). Then I heard the Vice President Cheney would certainly bring up the issue. Next I heard that the Supreme Court invited Obama over to “talk to him” about his documentation, and to serve him warning that he wouldn’t get into office without it. I heard next that the Chief Justice would not give the oath of office, to the incoming President, because of no documentation.
After all that was told to me, I then started hearing that — simply — one court and one judge, somewhere, could issue an order to Obama to vacate the office of President of the United States, and it would order a US Marshall to escort Obama out of the White House. Short of that happening, I have also been told that the U.S. Military will surround the White House with tanks and order Obama out of office, because they know it’s illegal for them to take orders from him, since “he is not really the President”...
Now, these last two items, there are posts that keep coming up almost every day to this effect. I know that I read on one of these threads, just today, that these last two options were viable and were going to happen.
THEREFORE — after hearing all this and seeing that nothing was working, and also after seeing that the conservatives *themselves* had “identified” a malady — called “Obama Derangement Syndrome” — I realized that this was what I had been hearing from, all this time.
So, the *real life solution* was simply to have states enact laws to properly vet a candidate and require the specific documentation required. Oklahoma and Arizona have started that already.
For those who may not know that “Obama Derangement Syndrome” has been identified and named by others (and is the source of articles, nationally)..., you can see the following...
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/avoiding-the-clutches-of-obama-derangement-syndrome/
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjQyOTgxM2M0YWMxOTdhZDcwMzlmMDU1ZGYxNzFkMmQ=
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16306.html
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=obama%20derangement%20syndrome
—
Thus, this is what I’ve been posting, that there are some *mighty strange derangements* in the “thinking” of some that I see posted here and they bear *no resemblance* to reality. I can see that all that those had posted before — has not worked. And so I started working with my own legislature, in this state (Oklahoma) to get that legislation through, and it is currently winding its way through the Oklahoma Legislature.
The amazing thing — is that many of those who totally oppose Obama being in office — *do not want to support* this legislation, as they say it’s a diversion or it won’t do anything or something along that line of thought.
It’s amazing because “this legislation” will probably be the *only thing* that will work... LOL...
I agree with you.
Legislation, at the state level, to require such documentation, WILL hurt Obama in the long run, more than any court case now pending.
I do seem to remember you or someone discussing the states remedy to this stuff in the future and it’s a grand idea. If Obama is not going to be litigated to show his birth certificate after the fact..our only other solution is to be ready when he tries to run again in 2012.
I say we do both though. The thing about Obama, is that he is clearly hiding something in his long form birth certificate. What-ever it is..it needs to be exposed. The man lies with abandon and he is lying about his birth certificate too.