Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE
All of the cases I've heard about have been rejected because no one in the entire country, apparently, has "standing" to file as an aggrieved plaintiff.

If no citizen has a legal right to know if the man in the White House is CONSTITUTIONALLY QUALIFIED, then why should we pay any attention to any of the other odds and ends in the document that supposedly apply to us? It is flamingly obvious (RE: Declaring DC a State), that various unwanted parts of the Constitution no longer apply. As such, please explain why the rest of it should obeyed, and that, since shooting traitors is not actually covered, either, we can thus proceed to the next step?

This has got to be the Largest COVERUP in American Jurisprudence!

132 posted on 03/01/2009 11:04:11 AM PST by jonascord (Hey, we have the Constitution. What's to worry about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jonascord

Ask your State Legislature to pass a bill requiring a Birth Certificate from anyone who seeks the Electors of that state, in any POTUS ballot or caucus.


171 posted on 03/01/2009 12:02:31 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson