Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb
If they ban the fairness doctrine only to implement localism, we conservatives are screwed.
23 posted on 02/26/2009 12:24:29 PM PST by Halfmanhalfamazing (Fairness doctrine = Red Herring. Localism is the real threat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Exactly. They will get the Fairness Doctrine through backdoor means.


25 posted on 02/26/2009 12:34:40 PM PST by navymom1 (Save Free Speech, defeat the Fairness Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Unless the ‘local content’ rule is so extreme that 30 hours of non-local content per week would violate it, or so transparently an attempt to quash Rush by requiring local content at exactly the hours he’s on that the courts would overturn it, I don’t think there’s much to worry about unless you’re fond of one of the lesser conservative talk show hosts who isn’t based in your area. It will be the lesser right wing talkers, and folks like Dr. Dean Edell and George Nori who will get replaced by local stuff. Rush and the more popular market-by-market of Hannity and Savage will keep their place, since they are the big advertising draws.

Actually, since conservative talk is what sells, a localism rule will mean local versions of Rush in every market, and it will be the left that gets screwed by their own rule.


55 posted on 02/26/2009 3:11:29 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson