Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: divine_moment_of_facts

Was he really that bad?


3 posted on 02/24/2009 10:17:16 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: luckystarmom

Only Fox News????


4 posted on 02/24/2009 10:20:35 PM PST by NewEnglander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: luckystarmom

“Was he really that bad?”

Yes.

Lesson learned—move on, GOP!


5 posted on 02/24/2009 10:23:05 PM PST by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: luckystarmom

If he had been talking to an audience of 6 yrs olds.. it would have been fine.


13 posted on 02/24/2009 10:32:55 PM PST by divine_moment_of_facts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: luckystarmom

He was. He was terrible. saying that “what” he said was good isn’t enough. The Party needs a leader, and absent Bobby Jindal 2.0, he isn’t it.


17 posted on 02/24/2009 10:38:06 PM PST by karibdes (It's not a perfect world. Screws fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: luckystarmom

No, he wasn’t that bad. I’m sick of all the Jindal bashing on FR tonight. He was okay. He can work on improving his delivery. I’m sure he was nervous. He’s no worse than anybody else I’ve seen deliver the rebuttal over the years.

He has the requisite substance to lead and that’s what is important. Superficials are just that and can be polished like diamonds in the rough.


26 posted on 02/24/2009 11:08:02 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson