a) I assume almost all Americans agree on most of the bill of rights (freedom of speech, freedom of religion, equality under law, etc.)-- What about the 2nd Amendment? What actually constitutes 'establishment' of religion? When does the 'separation' of church and state become a policy of official atheism and a suppresion of religion?
b) how much 'policing' power do we want to give the Fed gov? Reviewing this issue historically, was the Food and Drug Act the beginning of excessive interference? The income tax? The minimum wage? he Fed reserve? Paper currency? Environmental regulations and takings? What about the incorporaion clause and states rights? What would most even here on FR agree to?
c) What about the military and foreign affairs? Should a new Constitution force a libertarian, isolationist stance with a small military? Allow a draft? Require a draft? Leave things as they are?
Do w want to re-open the whole can of worms; or, do we want 'push-back' on certain critical areas: i) the RKBA an its incorporation against the states; ii) unrestricted political speech (no campaign finance 'reform', no 'unfairness' doctrine), iii) rejection of excessve federal regulation (environmental, economic, etc.) and an expanded sense of the takings clause (make the bastards pay) and re-privileging of private contracts; iv) term limits. Any other ideas?