Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Syncro

I’ve been blessed with being a constituent and campaigner for the late Senator Jesse Helms in NC, and I’m now a supporter for Senator Jim DeMint in SC. I think he’s telling the truth when he says he’s not looking for a face on the movement right now — his or anyone elses. I love Sarah Palin, but if DeMint were to run, I doubt I could vote against him.

Of course, this assumes we’ll have elections in 2012! I think it’s likely, but the possibility exists that we won’t, or if we do, they won’t matter (The census in the White House will allow Dems to Gerrymander themselves a PERMANENT majority and governing bloc).

It’s time for Patriot’s to move, to do SOMETHING. Support the State SOvereignty movement, stand up AND speak up! Demonstrate, call the folks in Washington, write letters to the editor, protest — if necessary, civil disobedience. Perhaps that could prevent much more severe and less peaceful eventualities...


80 posted on 02/22/2009 3:08:58 PM PST by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: patriot preacher
Yes it is time to be heard. Big Time.

More about Senator DeMint:

By Joseph DeCaro, BosNewsLife International Correspondent

WASHINGTON, D.C., USA (BosNewsLife) -- A high ranking American senator will force a vote next week to prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from reinstating the 'Fairness Doctrine', amid fears it could jeopardize Christian radio and conservative talk shows.

Republican Jim DeMint, who chairs the Senate Steering Committee, said his anti-Doctrine bill would halt attempts by the FCC to "censor" opinionated programs, and suggested the White House supported his proposal, BosNewsLife learned Sunday, February 22.

"I’m glad President Barack Obama finally confirmed his opposition to the Fairness Doctrine, which attacks the right of free speech on talk radio,” explained DeMint. "But many Democrats in Congress are still pushing [the Doctrine]. With the support of the new administration, now is the time for Congress to take a stand against this kind of censorship."

He added he wanted to push for an amendment within the next few days "so every senator is on record: Do you support free speech or do you want to silence voices you disagree with?"

"CONTRASTING VIEWS"

The 'Fairness Doctrine' mandated from 1949 to 1987 that broadcasters presented contrasting views on controversial issues.

Yet, instead of bringing political diversity to the airways, the Fairness Doctrine had a "chilling effect" on broadcasting debate as many networks  ceased airing controversial opinions to avoid giving opponents free airtime, critics said.

Amid mounting pressure, the FCC determined in 1985 that the Fairness Doctrine may have violated the First Amendment of the Constitution.  Two years later courts ruled that the FCC was no longer obligated to enforce it as it wasn’t mandated by Congress.  Soon after, Congress attempted to pass legislation restoring the Doctrine, but Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush vetoed the bills.
More at the hotlink in the title.
I also posted that on this thread

Congress Reconsiders the Fairness Doctrine (And why they shouldn't reinsate it)

Sunday, February 22, 2009 2:50:47 PM · by Syncro · 15 replies · 216+ views
Associated Content ^ | Feb 22, 2009 | Pricilla King

81 posted on 02/22/2009 3:35:31 PM PST by Syncro (Ti Ming -- Use Librally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson