Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ForGod'sSake
Many of the sovereignty resolutions under consideration in the states will not have the force of law. Even if they did, said Mr. Alt, "through the supremacy clause in the U.S. Constitution, so long as a federal statute is constitutional, it would trump state law."
~snip~

Huh? Can anybody help me out here with this "supremacy clause" legalese?

Our Constitution is the supreme "Law of the Land", and all officials in the USA are bound by oath to support/defend it, - the " Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding"..

Parse this for me. It seems a little, uh, troublesome to one interested in the sovereignty of the people AND the states:
THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE Article. VI.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

No 'parsing' needed. The kicker is -- so long as a federal statute is constitutional, -- and of course, many are not, and no local, state or fed official is bound by unconstitutional statutes..

85 posted on 02/20/2009 11:57:00 AM PST by jtom36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: jtom36
No 'parsing' needed.

There are hordes of Constitutional scholars that will be happy to hear that. ;^)

88 posted on 02/20/2009 8:25:17 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its shoes on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson