Me: >> ...why does it continue if they don’t reproduce?<<
Sir Francis Dashwood: >>The same reason why religion continues... <<
Sir Francis Dashwood: >>Your “understanding” is bull-shiite...
There is no evolutionary viability at all with homosexuals, that is a concrete scientific reality. <<
Sir Francis Dashwood: >>Homosexuality is a fetish like religion.<<
It sounds like you are equally critical of religion and homosexuality - is that what you really meant?
Homosexuality is a religion. It is a fetish... an idolatry of perversion. Excuse me if I refuse to bend my knee in acquiescence.
The same can be said for the temple of evolutionism.
The notion that children need to be indoctrinated and badgered into thinking a certain way is the insecurity of adults, a universal dissatisfaction with mortality reaching out for an eternal ideal. Whether this is done by atheists or by the religious, it is exactly the same ecclesiasticism.
Man did not come from apes... Man supposedly came from a common ancestor - the "missing link" Louis Leaky searched Oldavai Gorge 30 years in vain for.
But, the singularity of all life is the DNA molecule. All living things have it. Like the singularity of the "big bang" theory, evolutionists make the inadvertent admission life is some sort of immaculate conception...
Evolution, the theory, is called more properly "The Origin of Species." That was Darwin's title.
Evolution requires change over a period of time. Time then, by deductive reasoning must have a beginning.
The flaw in evolutionists' logic is that life did not come from the earth, because the earth came from somewhere else as well. Life came from somewhere else...