[gondramB]

>>

Evolution is only viable with HETEROSEXUAL relationships and this is also confirmed by the Judaic book of Genesis...<<

I should mention, I’m a physicist not a biologist... but my understanding is that non-reproducing members can still have some effect on the survival and development of a species... that said, I don’t remember Genesis covering the effect of homosexuality on evolution.

>>Do you think, based on the irrefutable evidence of this the emphasis should be, in a truly scientific analysis, that anything homosexual should be completely removed from public schools?<<

I don’t really follow you. If you are saying that homosexuality should not be a part of teaching science - I would agree. Its not a big topic at the high school level except it does present a biological question - why does it continue if they don’t reproduce? The other question that comes up is whether there is a biological basis.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

I’m a physicist not a biologist... but my understanding is...

Your "understanding" is bull-shiite...

There is no evolutionary viability at all with homosexuals, that is a concrete scientific reality.

You want to avoid the question with equivocation.

Homosexuality is a fetish like religion.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

...why does it continue if they don’t reproduce?

The same reason why religion continues...