In what way is scripture compromised by a moving Earth?
A stationary Earth would be the simplistic literal interpretation of not just that Psalm, but also Joshua 10:12-4 was taken to mean the Sun moved around a stationary Earth.
Psalm 93:1 was used by Calvin in a defense of Geocentricity.
It is not a “compromise” of the Bible to be Geocentric, nor did the Christian world change its opinion on the matter to have it be more in line with a literal interpretation of scripture.
==A stationary Earth would be the simplistic literal interpretation of not just that Psalm, but also Joshua 10:12-4 was taken to mean the Sun moved around a stationary Earth.
Nope, Joshua 10:12-14 can just as easily be understood from Joshua’s perspective. When you talk about a beautiful sunrise, you are making reference to the sun based on the way its movement appears to you. It doesn’t mean the sun is literally rising.