Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thefrankbaum
the idea of the State acquiring the property of the dead when there is a spouse still living is anathema to them,

Then hire an attorney and have a Will written and that won't happen. It's not the job of the State to babysit people who are too lazy to take basic legal precautions.

That said, I still don't agree with the elimination of marriage as a legal relationship, for a variety of reasons.

Consenting adults should be free to register their wishes with the relevant Courts using Wills, Powers of Attorney, and Contracts as they see fit.

The State, however, should have no voice in approving or disapproving those relationships. It's quite frankly none of their business.

L

72 posted on 02/20/2009 8:17:25 PM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker
The State, however, should have no voice in approving or disapproving those relationships. It's quite frankly none of their business.

I disagree. "The State" is merely a construction of society, and a well-ordered society is built by family units, not individuals. Society is actually an organic growth of extended family units. Allowing marriage special legal privileges is a way of incentivize marriage, and thus create stable families, providing order to society. Where marriage has deteriorated most precipitously - inner cities - order has broken down as well. This obviously has a negative effect on society at large, and thus, to prevent this, we get back to society, through its construct of "The State," encouraging marriage.

73 posted on 02/20/2009 8:58:08 PM PST by thefrankbaum (Ad maiorem Dei gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson