Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Allows Oklahoma Workers to Have Guns in Vehicles
The Oklahoman ^ | February 19, 2009 | ROBERT E. BOCZKIEWICZ

Posted on 02/19/2009 10:11:28 AM PST by cashion

ATTORNEY GENERAL USED AN NRA LAWYER TO ARGUE THE STATE’S POSITION

DENVER - An appeals court said Wednesday that Oklahoma’s law allowing employees to have guns at work in their locked vehicles is valid.

The Denver-based court’s decision overturns a ruling by U.S. District Judge Terence Kern in Tulsa, who barred enforcement of the law.

Gov. Brad Henry and Attorney General Drew Edmondson appealed Kern’s 2007 ruling.

"It was our opinion that the law is constitutional and the court agreed with us today,” Edmondson spokesman Charlie Price said. "We are thankful for the assistance of the National Rifle Association and its counsel — they provided great help.”

Starting with a 2004 lawsuit, several companies challenged the law, including Weyerhauser Corp.; Whirlpool Corp., which later dropped out; and more recently, ConocoPhillips.

"The safety of our employees is a top priority of ConocoPhillips and we are disappointed with today’s decision,” said company spokesman Rich Johnson, adding that the company has not determined whether to appeal.

THE RULING

The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decided 3-0 that Kern erred in concluding the law is pre-empted by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act.

Kern said gun-related workplace violence was a "recognized hazard” under the act and the state law interfered with employers’ ability to comply with the act.

"We disagree,” the appellate judges in Denver wrote. "OSHA is aware of the controversy surrounding firearms in the workplace and has consciously decided not to adopt a standard (banning firearms from the workplace).”

The appellate judges said Kern’s ruling "interferes with Oklahoma’s police powers and essentially promulgates a court-made safety standard. ... Such action is beyond the province of federal courts.”

Edmondson, in an unusual step, had an attorney for the rifle association instead one of his own lawyers argue the case at the appeals court. The court had allowed the NRA to submit arguments as a "friend of the court.”

The court allowed the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence and several safety and business groups to submit arguments as friends of the court in support of Kern’s ruling.

THE LAW

The law, which allows nonfelons to lock legal guns in their vehicles while parked at work, was passed in two stages in 2004 and 2005.

The law was proposed by legislators after Weyerhauser reportedly fired eight workers who violated policy by having guns in their vehicles at a mill in southeastern Oklahoma.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: banglist; digg; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-223 next last
To: cashion

If guns are such a problem in the workplace, why aren’t there more shootings at police stations?


61 posted on 02/19/2009 12:38:15 PM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Precisely.


62 posted on 02/19/2009 12:38:44 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: qam1
A workplace is private property and if the owner doesn’t want guns on their private property then they have every right to ban them. Don’t like it, leave the gun home or find a new job.

It's not so much that employers disliked guns, it's that OSHA was pressuring employers behind the scenes to adopt rules against guns as a "workplace safety" issue. This ruling lets employers off the liability hook.

63 posted on 02/19/2009 12:38:48 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos; qam1

That is your idea of freedom? I don’t like kids so I can tell you that you aren’t allowed to have a baby seat in your car when you work for me?

I am a Muslim and I can’t discriminate against hiring you but I can tell you not to have a bible in your car?

You have some screwy ideas of freedom.


64 posted on 02/19/2009 12:40:22 PM PST by ansel12 ( When a conservative pundit mocks Wasilla, he's mocking conservatism as it's actually lived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Malsua

“If guns are such a problem in the workplace, why aren’t there more shootings at police stations?”

And if criminals cannot differentiate between gun free zones and gun zones (as the left claim), then why are there no shootings at gun ranges?


65 posted on 02/19/2009 12:40:51 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TYVets
Your property rights ends at my tires

Fixed.

We had this little debate a couple of weeks ago. My position as the business owner is to create a safe work environment. If I say guns are not allowed, that absolves me of all liability if you desire to bring a weapon and leave it locked in your vehicle.

One, it's not technically violating the rules I have laid out, simply because I cannot search your vehicle at random, or ever. SO HOW WOULD I KNOW?

Two, Your property and privacy of your vehicle trumps my ability to enforce the rule UNLESS: you play show and tell in the parking lot, someone breaks into your vehicle and steals it, or it goes off while you move it around in the trunk/backseat. Then we have a problem.

Some though, believe it is an absolute, one way or the other.

66 posted on 02/19/2009 12:41:11 PM PST by Pistolshot ("Democrats don't show respect, they just demand respect " - ClearCase_guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cashion
"The safety of our employees is a top priority of ConocoPhillips and we are disappointed with today’s decision,” said company spokesman Rich Johnson, adding that the company has not determined whether to appeal.

Frank Phillips is turning over in his grave..!!!

67 posted on 02/19/2009 12:42:46 PM PST by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cashion

The court should have left the company an out.

If the company wants to refuse the possession of a firearm in a locked car, then the company is required to provide armed escort and insurance against preventable harm coming to the disarmed employee from work to home and vice-versa.

That way the company can remain safe for killers who wouldn’t obey the law anyway and employees can be safe as they transit to and from work to home.


68 posted on 02/19/2009 12:44:08 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TYVets
Your property line ends at my tires.

And your tires are on my property and so if you want to keep your job, then you had better find an off-premises parking space.

69 posted on 02/19/2009 12:45:27 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cashion

The wording is wrong on this article. The state doesn’t “allow” people to have guns in their vehicles, the state affirms that the people have the God given right to be armed. To buy into the crap that the state “allows” us to have firearms is to buy into the crap they have the right to take them away from us.


70 posted on 02/19/2009 12:45:37 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
In New Mexico one’s vehicle is considered “extended domain” or the same as your house. As long as the firearm is in the vehicle, a company can’t say boo about it.

I like that.................

MOLON LABE

71 posted on 02/19/2009 12:46:15 PM PST by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Absolutely right on...PKM!!
72 posted on 02/19/2009 12:47:45 PM PST by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Does this mean your workers cannot have a pack of cigarettes in their car????

Honestly, I never thought about that. But I do think that if I wanted to prohibit the possession of all tobacco products on my property, I would have the right to do that.

73 posted on 02/19/2009 12:48:56 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Horse shit. Your property rights don’t extend to mine. My vehicle is my vehicle and even though it’s tires are on your property is is MY property and none of your frickin’ business if I have a gun in it or not. You think property rights triumph all but you refuse to respect others property rights.Once I step onto your property and out of mine(my car)then, yes, you have control and can say I can’t carry onto your property, but my car is mine and what’s in it is also mine and is not subject to your control.


74 posted on 02/19/2009 12:51:16 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
That's not the point. I own the business, I pay your salary, I have the right to make work rules no matter how ridiculous they may seem.

You don't have the right to what radio stations I listen to in my car, do you?

You don't have the right to tell me I can't have a box cutter in my car, do you?

What about a screw driver..and a tire iron? You gonna tell me I can't have those in my car too?

75 posted on 02/19/2009 12:51:25 PM PST by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: qam1
"A workplace is private property and if the owner doesn’t want guns on their private property then they have every right to ban them."

What you fail to understand is that the inside of the vehicle is NOT the "private property" of the business. It's the private property of the vehicle owner, no different from the inside of his/her home. The fact that said vechicle may, for some time, be parked on the business owner's lot is of zero relevance.

76 posted on 02/19/2009 12:52:14 PM PST by Wonder Warthog ( The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Malsua
Nice................

MOLON LABE!!!

77 posted on 02/19/2009 12:52:57 PM PST by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

As it should be. If the company wants to buy me a car, then they can dictate whats inside it.


78 posted on 02/19/2009 12:53:14 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Utinam coniurati te in foro interficiant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

Your property ends at my tires. So does your control over whats inside my car. It seems ridiculous, but them’s the rulez.


79 posted on 02/19/2009 12:54:23 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Utinam coniurati te in foro interficiant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: qam1
A workplace is private property and if the owner doesn’t want guns on their private property then they have every right to ban them.

I agree, HOWEVER, this needs to be added:

The company has, by not allowing self denfense weapons on it's property, implied that the property is safe, and the person doesn't need any weapons.

IF anything happens, the property owner should be held civily, and perhaps even criminally liable for his prohibition.

This judgement is just the tip of the iceberg, more and more individual property rights are going to be taken away.

80 posted on 02/19/2009 12:54:51 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If Liberals would pay their taxes, there would be no deficit..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson