I don't know about that, but of all the articles you pinged me to, it appears most of the usual suspects chose this one to infect with their usual failed projections and drivel.
What else do you call Christians who ridicule and disavow their fellow Christians in order to ingraciate themselves with Temple of Darwin atheists? From Richard Darwkins:
Although at times Richard Dawkins has applauded, and appealed to, Christian leaders for their opposition to creationist beliefs, elsewhere he has ridiculed them for believing in evolution. For example, he said:
Oh but of course the story of Adam and Eve was only ever symbolic, wasnt it? Symbolic?! Jesus had himself tortured and executed for a symbolic sin by a non-existent individual. Nobody not brought up in the faith could reach any verdict other than barking mad!2
And he went on to say:
It seems to me an odd proposition that we should adhere to some parts of the Bible story but not to others. After all, when it comes to important moral questions, by what standards do we cherry-pick the Bible? Why bother with the Bible at all if we have the ability to pick and choose from it, what is right and what is wrong?
Thanks for the ping!