Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Larry Lucido
Exactly. Here's how it works:

Assume you own your house -- fully paid for, no mortgage, no obligations apart from property taxes. Now assume that a comparable house in a comparable neighborhood could be rented for X dollars/month. Because you're enjoying the benefit of such a property but aren't paying rent, according to the "imputed income" fairytale you owe taxes on the X dollars/month you're not paying.

Clever, isn't it??

22 posted on 02/18/2009 5:47:12 AM PST by Tenniel2 ("When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one" -- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Tenniel2

Yep. I want everyone who has ever resided in a rent-controlled apartment, or who ever used a coupon to buy something, to pay taxes on ALL imputed income retroactively.


29 posted on 02/18/2009 5:53:12 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Tenniel2
Exactly. Here's how it works: Assume you own your house -- fully paid for, no mortgage, no obligations apart from property taxes. Now assume that a comparable house in a comparable neighborhood could be rented for X dollars/month. Because you're enjoying the benefit of such a property but aren't paying rent, according to the "imputed income" fairytale you owe taxes on the X dollars/month you're not paying.

Well, not exactly, if I understand your example. There are plenty of people who own their houses who do not pay "imputed income".

32 posted on 02/18/2009 5:57:53 AM PST by evad (.!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Tenniel2

RE does not own the house. And I have never heard of a person being burdened with imputed income on a house that he bought and paid for as a personal residence.


34 posted on 02/18/2009 5:59:38 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Tenniel2

Assume you own your house — fully paid for, no mortgage, no obligations apart from property taxes. Now assume that a comparable house in a comparable neighborhood could be rented for X dollars/month. Because you’re enjoying the benefit of such a property but aren’t paying rent, according to the “imputed income” fairytale you owe taxes on the X dollars/month you’re not paying.


You miss the point entirely. If you are providing a service for the person who owns the home, and they let you stay there in exchange for your services, THEN it is imputed income.


41 posted on 02/18/2009 6:09:05 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Tenniel2

I don’t drive my car everyday because I work at home a lot. I guess Cal could charge me the gas tax for the days, I’m not driving to work and using gas, because, lord knows, I should be.


74 posted on 02/18/2009 8:51:23 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson