Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laweeks

Why should she give up the baby for adoption? Because she’s not married? Seems to me that baby already has a loving family, regardless of whether the parents are married.


14 posted on 02/17/2009 6:35:34 PM PST by psjones (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: psjones

“Why should she give up the baby for adoption? Because she’s not married? “

Absolutely . . . the baby is NOT Sarah’s problem. Any and all babies deserve to be raised in a nuclear family headed by married parents . . . I can’t budge on that . . . that’s the root of a civilized society. If she’s that selfish to get pregnant to begin with, then she should give the baby to any one of the hundreds of thousands of married couples who want children.

I agree with Ann Coulter who feels that we’ve gotten to casual about unmarried parents. Why in the world hasn’t she gotten married? Or was this a campaign charade?


17 posted on 02/17/2009 6:38:28 PM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson