[[Facts are irrelevant if theyre not properly used.]]
Yup- true- Now, if you feel they weren’t ‘properly used’, then present the coutner evidence hsowing htis- “I reject it” Because “It’s presented on a creationist site isn’t a valid reason to reject it.
[[As I posted earlier, special cases do not prove the general case. Thats Scientific Method 101.]]
Nor does dismissing everything out of hand and claiming they are nothign but ‘special cases’ when there are MANY such cases. That’s science 101 as well.
“Nor does dismissing everything out of hand and claiming they are nothign but special cases when there are MANY such cases...”
Unfortunately, all of those cases are one-offs. They do not represent or support a consistent position or process. They are individually selected by YECs to throw stones at more rigorous science.
Together, they’re just a group of curious natural occurrences, many of which have alternative explanations. There is no cohesive story that they tell collectively.