To: Buck W.
mm:
But *credible* scientists routinely extrapolate variation within species to long term macroevolution all the time. So why is it a strategy that's valid in one branch of science and not another? BW:Credible scientists who dont want to be embarrassed in peer review draw conclusions based on science. Are you claiming that the geology of Surtsey is the same as the geology of Alberta? Are you REALLY claiming that?
Could you answer the question instead of accusing me of something I neither said nor implied?
Is there an evo around who could actually reply to what someone asks instead of replying to a strawman they constructed about the person they're replying to?
247 posted on
02/18/2009 8:00:53 AM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
You’ve experienced a hazard of joining a thread late. The comment to which you’ve responsed will make sense if you read the entire exchange.
248 posted on
02/18/2009 8:04:45 AM PST by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: metmom
I think you’re a thoughtful person so I’ll make it a bit easier for you. Start with post 84.
249 posted on
02/18/2009 8:13:01 AM PST by
Buck W.
(The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
To: metmom; Buck W.
Said metmom: Could you answer the question instead of accusing me of something I neither said nor implied?
Is there an evo around who could actually reply to what someone asks instead of replying to a strawman they constructed about the person they're replying to?
Alas I have not seen many evos of that caliber of late.
-Jesse
256 posted on
02/18/2009 10:39:49 PM PST by
mrjesse
(Could it be true? Imagine, being forgiven, and having a cause, greater then yourself, to live for!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson