[Buck W.]

“Keep having your tantrum of denial, but Surtsey demonstrates the same conditions in microcosm as the judgement: Volcanic eruption, heated water laden with carbonates, massive amounts of sediment, and rapid cementation of the initial layers.

Just can’t wrap your limited cognition around the destruction of your imaginary fantasy world, huh?”

Keep it civil, pal. Your anger betrays a deep-seeded doubt.

[editor-surveyor]

Anger? LMAOROTFDF!

You are a real case! Civil? is your deception civil? No, its evil, and stupid, and that is why we can’t help but laugh at you. You’re like a Hanna-Barbera cartoon character.

[tongass kid]

I was a young scientist when Surtsey erupted and watched with great interest the data and photos of Surtsey growth and development. Surtsey in scientific term is not a special case. I have never spoken with any other scientist that would call Surtsey a special case. There is nothing in the scientific peer reviewed papers that call Surtsey a special case. If you know of a peer review paper that put the title of special case on Surtsey please cite your reference. Thank you.