Dude- there is no ‘althernative explanation’ to what I psoted- they are verifiable facts
You’re ignoring the operative part of my post (which includes your excerpt):
“Unfortunately, all of those cases are one-offs. They do not represent or support a consistent position or process. They are individually selected by YECs to throw stones at more rigorous science.
Together, they’re just a group of curious natural occurrences, many of which have alternative explanations. There is no cohesive story that they tell collectively.”
Okay, um, Dude?