To: DJ MacWoW
I stated before that we have enough drunks on the roads. We dont need to add the drug addicted.
Then make it illegal to drive under the influence of drugs, since the laws work so well. Oh wait, it already is.
I guess one thing that favors your argument is that it is almost impossible to tell if someone is under the influence of pot, where it is easy to tell if they are drunk. So if a cop pulls over someone on pot, they will never be able to detect it unless they smoked it in the car and they smelled the smoke.
But if a cop cannot tell they are under the influence, then ?????
To: microgood
Look, if it’s easier to get pot, more people will. AND drive high.
112 posted on
02/16/2009 7:14:42 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: microgood
But if a cop cannot tell they are under the influence, then ?????How does a cop tell if someone is under the influence of valium or some other prescription drug?
There's no odor...
125 posted on
02/16/2009 7:52:00 PM PST by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(While the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson