Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kdot

“Wow, that’s generous. Is it one year per child? Why not have a big family and never have to work? Does the mother get the same benefit? Man - free money! “

Actually, it’s not a bad idea, if you want your culture to last more than the next 20 years.

Once women were allowed to work, birthrates DIVED, since the women now had other options. Note how traditional Muslim families don’t seem to have that birthrate problem.


9 posted on 02/15/2009 9:13:07 AM PST by BobL (Drop a comment: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2180357/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: BobL

I completely support stay-at-home Moms (or Dads). But if the Mom is home and the Dad gets 1 year off with 2/3 pay, then neither parent is working. You mention traditional Muslim families being large. What’s your analogy compared to the German situation?


10 posted on 02/15/2009 9:48:26 AM PST by kdot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: BobL
Note how traditional Muslim families don’t seem to have that birthrate problem.

As it is throughout western europe, muslims compose a high percentage of those on public assistance, meaning plenty of time to make babies.

13 posted on 02/15/2009 10:00:36 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson