Good News! Specter's Numbers Tanking In PA

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/02/good_news_specters_numbers_tan.html ^ | February 13, 2009

[Thermalseeker]

I don’t know if it’s true, but if he’s planning on retiring, he won’t care.

Want to ponder something really scary? I read recently that Specter has a "life long" ambition to become a Supreme Court Justice. I wonder if that is what Obamalamadingdong offered him for support of his spending boondoggle? There will almost certainly be two vacancies on the SCOTUS, and maybe three in the next four years.....

[MamaDearest]

Maybe Sen. Sphincter will have to cut back on his wining and dining visits to the White House until his numbers improve.

More likely he'll be included in most events at the White House and all liberal functions. Heck, Hollywood will probably even salute him (if only using their hands to do it).

GOP silence on these three traitors to their party and the anger of constituents toward them is deafening.

[txnativegop]

before you build something new, you must first destroy the old.

[vortigern]

Fifty-eight percent (58%) of Republican voters in the state are less likely to vote for Specter.

For this traitor, it should read like this:

Ninety-nine percent (99%) of Republican voters in the state are less likely to vote for Specter.

[arealconservativeforachange]

Awesome!

[Palin4ever]

Good. I can’t wait to vote against him in the primaries, and won’t shed a tear if he loses the general election(provided he gets that far).

[vetvetdoug]

I don't believe it. Pennsylvania voters put Murtha in with regularity and take all the feces he dishes out.

[abigailsmybaby]

I received an email yesterday that said he was given $6.5 million for one of his pet projects in porkulus. I didn’t save the email tho. The pet project is cancer research.

[DoughtyOne]

Your tag line is just as awesome from my point of view!

[Little Ray]

Sounds good. Discipline has to start somewhere.

[GonzoGOP]

.Nationwide, support for the stimulus legislation increased following President Obama’s nationally televised press conference earlier this week.

True, but its still lower than Bush's approval numbers.

[KrisKrinkle]

“...we can flog him (I’m not so inhumane as to burn him)”

‘Proper’ burning can be more humane than flogging to death. Instead of a slow roast you make enough smoke to cause quick asphyxiation or enough heat to quickly scorch the lungs so they don’t function.

Flogging can be slow.

[anniegetyourgun]

He’s the thing they are putting their trust in....not the bill. Oh, the blindness.....and the delusion.

[GonzoGOP]

Fifty-eight percent (58%) of Republican voters in the state are less likely to vote for Specter.

Yep and 42% said there was no chance they would vote for him in the first place. Ya can't get less than 0 and nothing is lower than 0bama

[DoughtyOne]

Mr. Haywroth:

Right now, we need to find people who can challenge our RINO Senators in 2010.

I would like to encourage you to run for the seat currently occupied by John McCain.

If we are going to remove the people who hurt us over and over again, we must do so early, so that we can support the individual that will replace them in the primaries of 2010.

Please give this consideration. Please join us to help make our Senate presence more supportive of Conservative ideals.

I will help you any way I can, both financially and on the ground in your state. I will travel on my own dime to do it. I will bring others with me.

With respect...

Ron Doughty

Glendale, California

[dbrew2u]

This is a NO-Brainer ! Specter is not,was not and never will be a Conservative Republican....Period ! He should have been voted out years ago.

[Cboldt]

Specter may well capitulate on "blue slip" practices relating to home-state senatorial power to withhold approval of a judicial nominee.

Uncertain 'Blue Slip' Policy Could Affect 4th Circuit - by David Ingram (Blog of Legal Times)

[arealconservativeforachange]

That’s great!

I’ve been trying to spread the word.

Hopefully he goes for it.

[DoughtyOne]

We’re looking at picking off three people next year. We should be able to focus on three people.

We also need to pick three of the worst Democrats, and pick them off too.

If we focus, we should be able to get our way on half of the attempts we make. That would be a very good outcome.

If we do that in the Senate for three or four cycles, we’re going to be in a lot better shape.

[arealconservativeforachange]

I agree.

We only have a few glaring idiots that need to be made examples of.

If we strike them down that may go a long way toward striking the fear of God into the squishy ones remaining.