And part of that job is exposing the med-school dropout turned amateur naturalist who presumed to reinterpret the entire history of biology based on a few minor variations between finches.
________
His background really seems to offend you, as you have now posted the med school dropout silliness, what, about a dozen times this week? Let’s face it, you would have exactly the same comments on his theory if he had been at the top of his med school graduating class.
Which makes the comment you have repeated over and over all week, what?, meaningless?
Actually, I would be much harder on him if he had actually been a trained scientist. Which, of course, he was not. Origins was nothing more than a long argument based on almost zero scientific evidence. Here is Darwood's so-called "tree of life" from origins. Care to identify the data points?
