To: STARWISE
But..but..but doesn’t that mean that now somebody worse will be nominated for that position? Didn’t we want Gregg their as the lesser of two evils? Aren’t we consigning ourselves to never being in power by not being bipartisan? Isn’t he just cutting off his nose to spite his face?
To: Prokopton
NO!
147 posted on
02/12/2009 1:52:53 PM PST by
STARWISE
( They (LIBS-STILL) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war- Richard Miniter))
To: Prokopton
Unless your #92 forgot this: /s
then: F 'bipartisanship'
It's just another way of saying 'appeasement'
191 posted on
02/12/2009 2:09:02 PM PST by
tomkat
(tar/feathers is way too subtle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson