She needs spiritual and mental health counseling, not death threats. If she can be shown that she would be doing the best thing for the children by adopting some of them out to stable two parent families then that would be a biblical response to her situation. Let them be open adoptions so she wouldn’t have to break all ties with them.
But using this case to argue for taking the children away from her by force because she is on welfare is using a bad case to make bad law. If we are going to start with her then we should start taking millions of children away from the mothers who bore and raised them but who are now on welfare. That’s something a totalitarian regime would do.
The children shouldn't be taken away because she is on welfare, which incidentally, she denies. She says it's not welfare, it is "help to those who need help."
The children should be taken away for two other reasons:
1. She is obviously mentally unbalanced and out of touch with reality.
2. She is not physically cabable of providing the level of care required to keep 14 children clean, fed and supervised 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Not to mention seeing they receive proper health care, doing the housework required to provide them with a clean and healthy home and doing all the other thousands of things necessary to provide a proper homelife and upbringing.