Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace
-- ... cloture would fail with only 59 votes, then Reid will also vote no so he can bring it up again at another time. --

The losing side in a failed cloture vote may, but need not have one member switch sides in order to make a motion to reconsider. I've always found the motion to reconsider a failed cloture vote to be moronic. There is no rule that says cloture can be called for only once on a given point. The Republicans made 8 cloture motions (6 failed votes, the 7th and 8th motions were withdrawn) to limit debate on a Motion to Proceed to the Consideration of a bill authorizing funds for the investigation of the Whitewater Development Corporation.

See Examples of cloture on "motion to proceed" (links to Congressional Record). If a cloture motion fails, just file another one. All Reid is doing with his "motion to reconsider" is protecting a sophomoric "number of times the other party made a cloture motion" sort of statistic. I see no purpose even for that.

34 posted on 02/10/2009 4:41:11 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

I have no idea why it’s done that way, but we’ve seen it many times over the past 8 or 12 years.

“It’s just the way it is.”

;-)


42 posted on 02/10/2009 4:59:43 AM PST by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson