Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LoneStarC
ordering the use of union labor for federal construction project

How does this play out in states that do not have labor unions?
10 posted on 02/07/2009 1:31:33 PM PST by Pantera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pantera

Plus no white men can benefit, must be looking for illegal alien union workers


14 posted on 02/07/2009 1:33:57 PM PST by 1000 silverlings (Everything that deceives also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pantera
I some times wonder about the age and mental abilities of many of the posters here. This was a standard add on to all Democrat bills when the were in charge before 1994.
16 posted on 02/07/2009 1:35:57 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pantera
How does this play out in states that do not have labor unions?

These are mostly conservative states. They may not be getting much in the way of federal construction money anyway. These Dems play hardball.

34 posted on 02/07/2009 1:49:49 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pantera

I think Big “O” has made things perfectly clear. Unless you are either union, or black (or probably BOTH)....

don’t expect to be gainfully employed in this, his “new AmeriKa”.


51 posted on 02/07/2009 2:07:23 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pantera
How does this play out in states that do not have labor unions?

It shouldn't (in theory, at least) change much in states without labor unions. This executive order does not "order[] the use of union labor," it simply allows the relevant federal agency to require the use of union labor (and a "project labor agreement" or PLA) on a project-by-project basis, where the agency believes that requiring union labor will "advance the Federal Government's interest in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement . . . "

In theory, at least, in states where union labor is non-existent, this order should not affect much (because using union labor in a state without labor unions could not possibly be economical or efficient). In practice, who knows? As some posters have mentioned/alluded to, it's possible that this could simply put a freeze on federal projects in such states...

81 posted on 02/07/2009 4:42:54 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pantera

Even “right to work” states have unions. Are there states without unions?


121 posted on 02/07/2009 6:43:26 PM PST by glock rocks (Zero: black, white, and red all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pantera
How does this play out in states that do not have labor unions?

Those states will be frozen out of any projects created by the stimulus (pork) bill. Also people living in those states will not be able to get government cheese and crackers.

134 posted on 02/07/2009 8:01:30 PM PST by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pantera
How does this play out in states that do not have labor unions?

Right to Work states will 'sit out' early federal funds....Then when they 'toe the line' and allow union workers in, and only then, will federal funds come with them.

166 posted on 02/08/2009 11:37:13 AM PST by CRBDeuce (here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Pantera
How does this play out in states that do not have labor unions?

They are probably "red" states and therefore won't get any money anyway.

187 posted on 02/09/2009 4:41:10 PM PST by reg45 (Be calm everyone. The idiot child is in charge!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson