Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: curiosity
But that's a seperate question from whether he is a natural born citizen, of which there is no reasonable doubt

The New York and Los Angeles Times sure didn't look like they saw it that way, and neither did some ASU professor.

If McCain had won the presidency, I have no doubt that lawsuits would have been flying to the courts to challenge McCain. And I'll bet McCain would have adjudicated the NBC issue in a court of law.

987 posted on 02/07/2009 9:50:16 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 976 | View Replies ]


To: Red Steel
You remind me of this scene from "My Cousin Vinny".

Vinny: My clients were caught completely by surprise. They thought they were getting arrested for shoplifting a can of tuna.

Judge Haller: What are you telling me? That they plead not guilty?

Vinny: No. I'm just trying to explain.

Judge Haller: I don't want to hear explanations. The state of Alabama has a procedure. And that procedure is to have an arraignment. Are we clear on this?

Vinny: Yes, but there seems to be a great deal of confusion here. You see, my clients...

Judge Haller: Uh, Mr. Gambini?

[Motions for him to approach the bench]

Judge Haller: All I ask from you is a very simple answer to a very simple question. There are only two ways to answer it: guilty or not guilty.

Vinny: But your honor, my clients didn't do anything.

Judge Haller: Once again, the communication process broken down. It appears to me that you want to skip the arraignment process, go directly to trial, skip that, and get a dismissal. Well, I'm not about to revamp the entire judicial process just because you find yourself in the unique position of defending clients who say they didn't do it.

994 posted on 02/07/2009 9:56:12 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 987 | View Replies ]

To: Red Steel; Polarik

Another talking point ad nauseum, regarding Polarik:

“He’s just a nobody on the internet so there is no credence in his analysis of the authenticity of the web posted COLB”.

And then, when asked could they describe why his analysis is “nonsense”, at least two have said that they have neither the time nor the interest in slogging through 160 pp of “nonsense”.

If Polarik’s detailed analysis is useless because he’s just a guy on the internet and Polarik is not his real name, then what the freaking he!! are their repetitive comments worth?!?! Why mess around with the internet at all, using screen names? Makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

BTW, Red, you’re points are dynamite.

(Courtesy ping to Polarik since I mentioned your name.)


998 posted on 02/07/2009 10:06:36 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 987 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson