The question has nothing to do with Berg. The question was directed at you. You avoided the question. Why is it that Obama has not shown his birth certificate to a court of law? Do you know why? Do you have an opinion? I'm sure you do.
So let me clue you in. This comes straight from Berg's amended complaint:
Even if Obama was, in fact, born in Hawaii, he lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother re-married and moved to Indonesia with her Indonesian husband.
Now tell me how Obama showing his birth certificate in a court of law would put an "end to this charade."
Again, the question was put to you why has Obama not showed any court his birth certificate? The charade would end to where Obama was born.
You can't, because your statement is as flat out wrong as it could possibly be.
No it's not. The most obvious reason that Obama will not show his birth certificate is that he was not born in Hawaii. If it's "flat out wrong" remains to be seen.
Yes. It's very simple. No court of law has asked him for it.
It one does, he will show it.
Now they’re trying “guilt by association” tactics. If we make a claim that Phil Berg has made, why, we’re throwing in with “9-11 ‘truthers.’” Berg has shown a lot of resolve on this, whatever his motives, and attacking him doesn’t faze me in the least. And regardless of any Indonesian citizenship, showing the vault copy would solve the mystery of Barry’s birthplace, as you say.