Substantiation of Hawaii's policy isn't provided simply by comparing a few photos. How do you know that whatever differences exist in those photos are not in keeping with the policy?
This is actually the major repeating flaw in Polarik's entire work. What he does is present two versions of something and then assert that differences (even when they are really there, which isn't always true) mean forgery. But differences don't necessarily mean forgery. That leap must be proven just as much as showing there are differences in the first place. That doesn't happen. Polarik's entire analysis ultimately rests on him saying the COLB is forgery just because he says so.
So, one week, the seal looks a certain way, the next week, they happen to use a different design; the week after that, they use another design altogether...etc, etc. I don't buy that, not for an instant.
Nope, if Obama really wants to settle this issue, once and for all, get him to release a copy of his long form birth certificate. There is simply no excuse for not doing so, by this point. None.