Obama should be held to the **same** standard of proof of other presidents!
Other presidents had entire **communities** of people ( neighbors, friends, and relatives) who knew the family and their origins. Our former presidents could point to armies of people who visited the mom and newborn soon after birth, who attended christenings, brought meals to to the new parents, watched the newborn grow into babyhood, childhood, and adulthood. Some could even testify of being present at the actual birth.
I am 62 years old, and I still have living relatives and friends of the family who visited me and my mom in the hospital, attended my christening, and watched me grow from a newborn to adult.
Hey!....Obama can't point to this type of self-evident evidence??? Gee! Well,...How about a **lesser** form of evidence? How about producing a valid birth certificate, adoption records, passports, and college admission forms!!!
Instead of addressing the issue of his citizenship, Obama denigrates, and coolly dismisses, every American citizen by claiming they have “no standing” to know of his origins. Shame on him!
And shame on us for allowing this usurper to be thrust upon us.
He is a shameful character, both in his policies and in the way he handles himself. But the public is catching on. Rasmussen shows his approval rating down again today:
Let him keep it up and everybody but the DNC will be filing eligibility suits.
And shame on us for allowing this usurper to be thrust upon us.
Maybe nobody wants to admit that his mother was actually a jackal.
Sal “So Many Omens, So Little Time” Amander
From what I recall in reading Article II, there is no Constitutional requirement that someone recall bringing the president's mother dinner after his birth.