Your implication is not directly stated, but is clear to me. Someone who would post ‘amateurish nonsense’ and try to pass it off as research would be a fraud (see definition).
You are insisting on reading something into clearly written words that simply isn't there. I don't know why you are doing that.
I'm not making any implication. I am specifically and clearly stating that the analysis is "amateurish" and "nonsense".
Neither implies fraud. "Amateurish" means it is unprofessional. "Nonsense" means it is wrong.