I have no horse in this race, I'm mainly just reading and think nothing will come of the controversy.
However, WND seems to think Dr. Polarik is authentic. Link.
Have you emailed Joseph Farah to find out if Dr. Polarik was vetted before his article was published? If not, your comment above is uninformed opinion not fact and has ZERO credibility. Besides that such a statement makes the rest of your repeated assertions suspect.
WND has been one of the principle promoters of the birther myth. They've become the Weekly World News of conservative politics. I wouldn't believe them if they said the sun would rise tomorrow unless I checked it myself.
"Dr. Polarik" is a self-admitted alias, not a real person. And you have the responsibility backwards. It is up to him to pony up his bonafides and prove his case. Not his critics to disprove him.