[Crystal Cove]

So, in other words, there is no evidence that he’s spent huge sums of money defending these cases?

[Michael Michael]

So, in other words, there is no evidence that he’s spent huge sums of money defending these cases?

Obama has only ever made three or four filings with the courts. All the other suits have been brought against Secretaries of State. So no, there is absolutely no evidence that he's spent huge sums of money defending these cases. And technically, he's never defended a single one because none of them have actually made it before the court. So far everything has been dismissed before making it that far.

[curiosity]

So, in other words, there is no evidence that he’s spent huge sums of money defending these cases?

You have it exactly right.

[Yooper4Life]

You’ll have to define what “huge sums of money means.” Also, I wasn’t the one advocating that claim. I simply pointed out the typical events involved with defending a lawsuit - whether it is ultimately dismissed or not. Defending a lawsuit entails costs - and if he had to defend 20 or so cases across the country and up through the appellate court system, the costs would add up. My position is that any costs associated with defending these cases (including the cost of lost trust of many of the American citizens) is larger than necessary, unless there is something to hide.

As I’ve also pointed out, I don’t know the number of these cases in which he’s actually been named a defendant. If he is named, he’d have to defend them or lose by default. If he is not named, then he obviously would not have to do anything.

Bottom line: I have no idea what he’s spent defending any lawsuits that he has been named in and I really don’t care. If he was as transparent as he claims, he’d have released the so-called vault copy long ago.