That doesn’t define “Natural Born,” it merely defines citizen at birth, which is not the same, and even then, those statutes are not retroactive; they only affect those born after their enactment.
Also note that the statutes that you post are in opposition to what you posted earlier. As per (a) a person born in the US is not a citizen unless under the jurisdiction of the US, so no resident visa, no citizen. Children of diplomats, and illegals that have not signed the acceptance clause in the application for a resident visa are not citizens, capiche????
No, I’m sorry you are wrong.
The legal meaning of Natural Born Citizen is one that is born a citizen, one that does not have to be “Naturalized” (made a citizen by operation of statute) at a later time.
It is NOT regulated solely by place of birth.
Argue all you want. The law is the law.
It is the same, as previous cites have shown.
"As per (a) a person born in the US is not a citizen unless under the jurisdiction of the US, so no resident visa, no citizen. Children of diplomats, and illegals that have not signed the acceptance clause in the application for a resident visa are not citizens, capiche????"
Wrong. An illegal alien is still under the jurisdiction. A diplomat is not.