"
You posted a specific exchange Steele made. You obviously are trying to make a point."
...no posting of Steele's words allowed? Steele made those points, and I do object to them.
Over the past couple of years, dissent from Republican members in regards to the Party movement further to the left has too often been answered with baseless rhetoric, anecdotes, insults and false accusations (e.g., the Giuliani flamefests). I recently left the Party, in part, because of that and was essentially told by the Party, as so many others have been told, "good riddance."
By your comments, it appears that you want to see some opinions from me. Alright. Here they are.
If you would rather compete for the votes of aging Hillary fans on their way to the nursing homes, then that's your prerogative. But stifling conservative dissent from facts with waves of rhetoric, insults and implied threats will bring further political consequences.
We've had it with
* Anti-family politicians (so-called "affirmative action" included).
* Anti-Second-Amendment politicians.
* Anti-defense politicians (including CFR members).
* Anti-American politicians (supporting anti-American, anti-defense business practices in favor of antagonistic, communist nations).
* A two-party system becoming effectively a one-party system that is more European in nature than American.
Supporting such politicians and using uncivilized arguments for them may temporarily get more funding for your Party, but it will also deprive your Party of needed votes for a very long time.
My positions are state quite well behind the following link, even though I do not own the site.
http://falconparty.com/