Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
Now if Michael Steele says the Supreme Court should FOLLOW stare decisis in regard to Roe v. Wade, what would that mean?

You are once again demonstrating your inability to handle this discussion.

I am looking for facts. You are merely spreading emotional responses and trashtalk you can't back up.

Think before you type.

LOL! Take your own advice--for all your previous bluster, strangely muted now, you've been schooled. Now go play, kid. ;)

115 posted on 02/05/2009 5:12:10 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life Capitalist American Atheist and Free-Speech Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377; sitetest; xzins
I am looking for facts.

You were given the FACTS. You were given the definition of "stare decisis" and the words of Michael Steele.

What more do you want?

LOL! Take your own advice--for all your previous bluster, strangely muted now, you've been schooled.

Indeed I have. That is why I am licensed to practice law.

116 posted on 02/05/2009 5:24:24 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377; P-Marlowe

Let’s say that I declare that I am going to meet you in St Louis and FOLLOW you to Indianapolis.

Does that mean:

A. That I will FOLLOW YOU.

B. That I will NOT follow you.


120 posted on 02/05/2009 7:09:27 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain, Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson