Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway
Brown told the court in a filing that he doesn't think that Proposition 8 is a constitutional revision or that it violates the constitutional separate of powers. But he said he believes it is unconstitutional because it violates the inalienable right to liberty.

Which liberty? The liberty to rewrite the laws and language that have stood for thousands of years for a political agenda?

Or the liberty to queer off?

Because they have the liberty to hump each other.

They don't have the liberty to rewrite the language and destroy society.

/johnny

6 posted on 02/03/2009 11:19:55 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (God Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper

But he said he believes it is unconstitutional because it violates the inalienable right to liberty.

How so?...No one said to round up the queers and they still get to prance in their vile little parades.

What liberty is being denied?

They are free to live with whomever they choose, free to practice their genital preference but they cannot call themselves “married”.

Its not a “liberty” issue.

The supreme court has no say in this...the people have spoken.


29 posted on 02/04/2009 3:39:11 AM PST by Adder (typical basicly decent bitter white person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson