Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dervish
I don’t understand why if there were two counts and there were different winners why does the Franken one dictate the result?

Because unfortunately the so-called more accurate manual recount was the last count, even though the demoRATs cheated & scammed by using a machine recount in one precinct in Mpls because they just KNEW that an envelope of 133 ballots was missing.... which sent 46 more votes to Frankenstein than Coleman. And numerous other inconsistences in demwit precints, all par for the course.

Remember in WA state in 2004, Dino Rossi won the 2 machine recounts but lost the 3rd & final manual recount when the dims kept finding 10,000 ballots, than another 150 ballots, then ballots here, ballots there.... the moment the count favored Christine Fraudoire by THREE votes, she declared herself to be the winner. In the end it was 110 votes or so, and the RINO coward SOS immediately certified Fraudoire as the governor. Went to court, duly noted the inconsistencies numbering in the thousands, and the demoRAT court judge promptly ruled the election results were valid and would stand. That is how demoRATs cheat & steal & win close elections when you can always count on liberal corrupt judges to rule in demoRATs favor. I give Norm Coleman no more than 10% chance that he will now be able to pull this one out.

139 posted on 02/03/2009 8:33:23 PM PST by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: rcrngroup

Rossi lost the election contest for a couple of reasons. The Davis Wright Tremaine (DWT) lawfirm represented the GOP, the same firm that hired former Gov. Locke just aftrer he left office. For some reason, DWT neglected to allege vote fraud in its initial complaint when everyone with half a brain knew there was voter fraud. Think that was simply an oversight? Rossi also had proof of Gregoire’s racketering, but refused to use the information because it would have also implicated several of his friends. IOW, he decided to risk losing the election in order to protect his friends.


145 posted on 02/03/2009 9:02:44 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: rcrngroup

Thanks. I think there should be a ‘run off’ count


146 posted on 02/03/2009 10:35:47 PM PST by dervish (Gitmo, coming soon to a neighborhood near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson