Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chet 99

No, there is no reason they might be for Coleman but as he says.. all ballots need to be counted not just a selective few.

Besides the fact that Frunken is hot to keep them from being counted says something in itself.


100 posted on 02/03/2009 5:22:39 PM PST by TribalPrincess2U (Welcome to Obama's America... Be afraid, be very afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: TribalPrincess2U
No, there is no reason they might be for Coleman but as he says.. all ballots need to be counted not just a selective few.

Besides the fact that Frunken is hot to keep them from being counted says something in itself.

Exactly - Franken knows he pulled a fast over Normie, and was trying to run out the clock. Again, the Minnesota Supreme Court massively screwed up by going outside Minnesota statute to allow the campaigns to review rejected absentee ballots and open/count the ballots they agreed were improperly rejected. If they hadn't, Coleman would most likely have been ahead after the recount, and it would be Franken filing the contest.

In this phase, the judges should be reviewing all of the rejected absentee ballots to see which ones were improperly rejected, not just those complained about by one or both sides. The whole point of this process (recount/election challenge) is to try to determine the rightful winner. Shouldn't be counting/reviewing just part of these ballots. Hopefully the state legislature will address this when they revise our election laws.

106 posted on 02/03/2009 5:49:18 PM PST by GreatOne (You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson