Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
Ending human life for the purpose of research when other methods are available and more productive is the opposite of compassion....Embryonic stem cell research is senseless.

The biggest source of embryos for research right now is not abortions, as some seem to believe, but the in-vitro fertilization industry. It is not unusual for a couple to have many more embryos than they could possibly use created, only to be left in storage indefinitely or destroyed (or used for research) when that couple has completed their family.

There's an argument to be made that using "leftover" embryos for research is more compassionate than simply destroying them, which is the other most-likely option for couples who don't want any more children, and don't want unknown genetic full-siblings of their children out there either.

Perhaps the United States should enact regulations such as those in Britain that limit the number of embryos a couple can have created at one time.

160 posted on 02/03/2009 10:29:14 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Amelia
We are catapulting headlong down the proverbial slippery slope, Amelia.

The wrongness of creating human beings that will be discarded doesn't justify the wrongness of using those human beings for research.

Embryonic stem cell research is wrong.

172 posted on 02/03/2009 10:57:00 AM PST by ohioWfan (Thank you PRESIDENT BUSH!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson