Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377

In fact this entire thread is nearly fictitious. It’s based very largely on overblown views (in some cases massively overblown) of what Michael Steele is actually trying to say. If we can’t accept that we can be principled, conservative, and expansive as a party/movement then I’d like to hear a plausible alternative for our future.


534 posted on 02/02/2009 9:17:15 PM PST by Norman Bates (Congratulations Chairman Michael Steele!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies ]


To: Norman Bates
In fact this entire thread is nearly fictitious. It’s based very largely on overblown views (in some cases massively overblown) of what Michael Steele is actually trying to say. If we can’t accept that we can be principled, conservative, and expansive as a party/movement then I’d like to hear a plausible alternative for our future.

Thank you.

I can't figure out why people can't understand the need to convince more people of the rightness of conservative principles--which is the exact opposite of being a RINO or becoming liberal, despite the foolish comments of those who can't understand. Where are we to get new voters from if not from the ranks of those who presently DON'T vote our way?

I think it's just too much work for people to get informed about conservative values and then communicate with others and convince them of the truth. Much easier to shout "We don't talk to them RINOs" and sit back, pleased with ourselves, while those potential conservatives look elsewhere.

I figured that was a no-brainer. Apparently that's too much for some folks to grasp.

536 posted on 02/02/2009 9:23:13 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life Capitalist American Atheist and Free-Speech Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson