Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: QBFimi
QBFimi (Retired B-767 Captain; wife is currently a B-767 Captain flying the Pacific)

After all your years flying, I have one question for you. What is more of a thrill for you, the take-off or the landing? And has your answer remained the same since you started flying? Thanks for a reply.

33 posted on 02/01/2009 2:45:00 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Ronaldus Magnus Reagan

>> [a question for] QBFimi (Retired B-767 Captain)

Q:What is more of a thrill for you, the take-off or the landing?

The best rush for me has always been the landing, especially when breaking out of the clouds during a low-visibility approach. Later in my career, of course, on the Category III approaches, two pilots only watched the autopilot fly the thing; then when it touched down and you could barely see the runway, your thoughts were more like: “Where the hell is the taxiway?” (if it had snowed at the airport). Or “How am I gonna drive home in this?”.

One exception: The B-767-200 at the start of takeoff roll. The -200 had a guttural audio roar to it when takeoff power was first applied - it sounded like a manly-man’s testosterone rush - on steroids. Arg! ;o)


37 posted on 02/02/2009 11:22:48 AM PST by QBFimi (When gunpowder speaks, beasts listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson