[hoosiermama]

Actually only the certified vault copy presented by an officer of the court would be accepted. So you are not correct.

[mlo]

"Actually only the certified vault copy presented by an officer of the court would be accepted. So you are not correct."

Nope. The paper certified copy which was scanned and photographed would be accepted. It does not have to be the "vault copy".

[ponygirl]

Hoosiermama, I just checked this mlo guy's back posting log back to January 20th and he or she has spent the entire day every single day posting about nothing but this subject - debunking the "truthers" or "birthers" as he calls them. Either he's on someone's payroll to do this, he doesn't mind bilking his employee for days spent on FR "debating" this issue (by sticking his fingers in his ears and going "la la lalalala!"), or he owns his own business. Whoever is running that business while he spends weeks debating The One's eligibility issues is anyone's guess.

Then I found this comment: "Someone can easily accuse you and your side of using “Alinsky methods”. Argue the issues, not the posters." Ah, the truth is always revealed eventually.

Would love to know who he works for. Or is it already obvious?

I recommend ignoring him. He has stamina, and he has someone paying him to do this all day long - something that the rest of us don't have. It's a typical liberal ploy. If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh!t until the fight is worn out of them.