Posted on 01/30/2009 4:55:46 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has denounced the unfettered capitalism of the past three decades and called for a new era of "social capitalism".
-snip-
"Neo-liberalism and the free-market fundamentalism it has produced has been revealed as little more than personal greed dressed up as an economic philosophy.
-snip-
As Franklin Roosevelt rebuilt US capitalism after The Great Depression, modern day "social democrats" such as himself and US president Barack Obama, must do the same again, Mr Rudd writes in a 7,000-word essay in The Monthly magazine.
(Excerpt) Read more at livenews.com.au ...
Rut Roh. Can Sharia be far behind?
Now that Gulliver has been pinned down, the rest have not a chance...
As an alternative, I would suggest a mild dose of neo-eatmyshortsism, followed by a strict regimen of proto-bitemeism, followed by an “easing” period of metabuffoonistics, performed on an ensolite mat in the outback at high noon.
God bless Australia, God Save America!!
Now there's an oxymoron!
- Traveler
I guess stretching out the Depression for a decade “rebuilds” Capitalism in Liberal land.
0 won't be happy until US free market is obliterated.
“social capitalism”. Another pc description by libtards in the tradition of “pro-choice”, “progressive” etc.
—ever wonder why you have never heard of “capitalist socialism’?
I know. I can ‘hope’ that it will ‘change’ can’t I?
Social Capitalism. A peace loving Wahabi. A Gazooka for Israeli soverignity. A tax cutting liberal. A prolife NAG...
When will these dolts stop citing Roosevelt and start citing their real heroes like Ceaucescu or Lenin or Mao or Hugo Chavez. Communist gutter trash, that’s who is running the once great “democracies.”
There is no such thing as Social Capitalism. Calling for such a thing is cover for calling for socialism.
Just another move toward Orwellian Newspeak. In this case, the term and the concept of "capitalism" is being absorbed into the term and concept of "socialism". Ultimately, socialism will be the new capitalism. Then it's all good, right?
................................
It was intended that when Newspeak had been adopted once and for all and the Oldspeak forgotten, a heretical thought - that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc - should be literally unthinkable, at least so far as thought is dependent on words. Its vocabulary was so constructed as to give exact and often very subtle expression to every meaning that a Party member could properly wish to express, while excluding all other meanings and also the possibility of arriving at them by indirect methods. This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings.
Neo-Liberalism?
I prefer bolshevik.
The word progressive has some history to it.
Not exactly as flattering as they would think. Basically another name for Facist in the 1920s.
See the excellent book “Liberal Facism” for a great discussion on this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.