[[Yep, for instance, they seem blissfully unaware that the gravitational time dilation that would result from the formation of a universe with a center and an edge could easily account for distant starlight reaching a young earth. As is so often the case, they criticize what they don’t understand.]]
Yep- I’ll look for that link- the ‘explanation’ that attempts to dismiss this problem was quite amusing- and beleive it ornot, the article was written in one of hteir own ‘science’ publicaitons outlining hte top ten problems with macroevolution hypothesis and old age hypothesis’- but again, they were quick to link to ‘new studies’ that fudge the facts to dismiss the problems.
I this were the case, why then would we be able to see second generation stars that are made up of numerous elements rather than just hydrogen?
They probably formed of material that was created in a nova. Like our solar system.
First generation starts are all hydrogen, minus the byproducts of fusion.
The bigger the star (beyond a certain point) the faster it blows up.